data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/604fe/604fec85986c86e8a3e2f97771a81d3eae4d9322" alt=""
Anarchy
is simply an absence of government, an absence of that which does not
and never will work. While the idea of having a government to govern the
civil service seems legitimate enough, it is unfortunate that too few
understand the difference between governing the civil service and
subjecting the free citizens of the state to slavery. We are told that
we are free as long as we follow all the “laws”. This is a lie. If you
have to follow all this legislation that pretends to be “laws” you are a
slave. It is that simple. The legal definition of free is “not subject
to the legal constraint of another”. A free man is self governing. A
slave follows rules and regulations. To those that constantly tell me we
need to be subjected to all the rules and regulations of this foreign
church I would ask, is the only thing that stops you from committing
transgressions against your fellow man a written rule? The only thing
that stops you killing everyone in sight: a written rule? The only thing
that stops you from stealing everything you can at every opportunity a
written rule? Is the only thing that compels action or in-action a
written rule?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4cd8/d4cd8b6b25df4a6753be09afe25705b8adbcbbb4" alt=""
There
is a lot being said about the New World Order. Some people see it as
the Corporate takeover of the world; a global fascism of lawyers with
society ruled by Judges. Some people see it as the common subjection of
the nations of the world in a dominion of God’s chosen; global feudalism
of priests with society ruled by Kings. In both orders the lot of
Hu-Man-ity is as a ruled Slave. In actual fact these are the only two
sides regardless of how many players are on the board and they are both
owned by the same people. Their banker owners play both ends of the
field to keep the human resource chattel herds running down the middle.
Slavery rule through God “Law” is the Old World Order. Slavery rule
through Man “Law” is the New World Order. Regardless of name, it is
always slavery controlled by legislative “Law”. Theories abound about
this “New World Order”. In our world of controlled media, the most
idiotic are promoted as the first facts, the slightly more credible next
and the obviously impossible last. However, if you do offer
well-researched facts and someone gets wind of it, the lapdog media is
sure to cry “conspiracy theorist” and do all they can to heap derision
on it. Let us never the less endeavour to throw some light on the truth
and apply some common sense.The entire raison d’etre behind the staged
charade is TO INSTALL A PRIVATE LEGAL SYSTEM. Keep in mind always that
free men are self-governing and when you apply it to them; LEGISLATION
IS SLAVERY. The United Nations is all about establishing this private
legal slavery system franchise globally.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f6f6/5f6f6670a0f480cc8b0c8bddbdfb4e0230cf4d7d" alt=""
Free
men are self-governing and live in self-governing countries. Slaves are
subjects that live in dominions of commonly United Nations. Notice that
all that has happened is an evolutionary exchange of one form of
slavery for another, national slavery to multinational to global
slavery. The biggest problem in establishing a global slavery system is
of course one of logistics. How do you govern six billion people? The
first thing is to get rid of four fifths of the population. Getting rid
of the eighty percent of the human race that are useless eaters solves
eighty percent of the logistics problem. Attacking the food supply is
the easiest way of achieving this. Genetically altered seeds
cross-pollinate with other seeds in your garden making all of them
infertile. Unhealthy foods, fertilizers and weed killers bring a
plethora of health problems. Vaccinating animals with poisons that
destroy their immune systems and then feeding them waste by-products
from slaughter-houses in huge feed lots poison our food livestock and
environment on a grand scale. Attacking the population directly is more
risky. The most effective way to do that is covertly with drugs and
toxins. The CIA has a long history of human experimentation. They are a
front organization of the British Crown of Israel, the world’s largest
covert drug dealer for centuries. Four times as many people die in North
America every year from pharmaceutical drug use as from illicit
narcotics. Not only is our food directly vaccinated with poisons that
destroy their immune systems it is also “mandatory” to poison your
children in the same way. SIDS, autism and a host of disorders are
caused by vaccinations. As if controlling the population is not enough,
governments use chemical trails and HAARP systems to control the
weather. All these toxins rain down on us and flow into the same water
that all the industrial toxins and fertilizers do, adding to all of the
pollution. When you get sick from all of it you can run off to see a
licensed Doctor; they are the number one cause of death in our society.
One thing is certain about the New World Order; most of us are not
welcome in it. Our very survival dictates that we understand who is
behind this world order, what they want and how they expect to achieve
it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1300d/1300d44539d66a3ffd96c477ac843d2a0f8f77c6" alt=""
The
most effective way of controlling a population is to lie to it. When
people never know the truth, they never understand the true nature of
the problem and they are hopelessly entrapped by the ensuing inability
to find a solution. You cannot provide solutions for what you do not
understand. For this reason, 90% of intelligence black operations are
exercises in disinformation. One form of disinformation is History.
Remember always that the victor in control writes officially sanctioned
His-story. Another is to give 80% of the truth and 20% obvious nonsense.
Hearing only the 80% truth later, many will automatically equate it
with the 20% nonsense that first accompanied it and discredit all of it.
Another is to simply lie outright and then challenge your opponent to
prove you wrong rather than provide proof of what you contend.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38a72/38a72dc5e70d2483763b93f99d0bff3e809ec0b8" alt=""
The
natural “Law” is of necessity unwritten. The only way you can lawfully
be compelled to court is if you have done another hu-man an injury;
physical, mental or financial. To render unto every man his due, each
case must be looked at and weighed upon all the circumstances of the
event. Since each moment of time is unique and discrete, so are all
claims. A man, or natural person, is called to answer a claim in front
of a jury of his peers. It is rationalized that a dozen people from his
society will understand if he has comported himself in a moral and
ethical manner. It is the jury that decides his guilt, not a judge. An
accused is presumed innocent. The reason for this is because in order
for there to be evidence of an event, an event must have taken place.
You cannot examine a non-event. Now think about this. If I am out
hunting and I come across a warm patch of hay that is laid down, I will
know that deer have lain there recently. I have evidence of an event
since an event has taken place; the deer have lain here. It is not ever
logical to ask someone to prove their innocence. Innocence cannot be
proven. If you have done nothing there is no evidence. This is why it is
incumbent upon the accuser to prove their case. It is typical of the
Crown and their minions to make bizarre claims and then attempt to shift
the onus of proof onto their hapless victims but they are clumsy and
blatant in their attempts. If one thinks about the bizarre claims that
the British make about God, one finds them trying to defend their claim
by a similar process of logical reversal. Asking them to prove the
existence of their God they either point to the book they wrote or ask
you to prove to them that their God does not exist. It is their claim
that God exists and thus it is up to them to prove their claim. If they
claim their God gave them the earth it is of course incumbent upon them
to produce said God. It is illogical to claim there is a God and then
ask us to prove there isn’t when we say Bullshit. As noted above, you
cannot prove the non-existence of something that does not exist. You can
only prove the existence of something that does exist. The British God
is as phoney as they are.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/daee1/daee13575f265089d23a3669fc423f05594d8772" alt=""
All
other “systems of law” other than natural law are illegitimate. British
Common Law is a coerced agreement between a despotic monarch and peers
of the realm. It has nothing to do with the emancipation of subject
slaves. It is nothing more than Imperial UK feudal rules and
regulations. Maritime Law and Admiralty Law are virtually synonymous.
This is the law of the high seas, also known as Piracy. The law of the
high seas is; there is no law. Canada’s ecclesiastical courts operate a
kind of bastardized mixture of Common-Piracy-Equity police state law.
The whole lot is illegitimate, but incredibly lucrative. Crime pays big
time for the Crown in Canada. Most of all there is no crime until the
RCMP move in with their little ticket books and start ticketing
everything in sight. They also get to auction off any “stolen property”
they recover. (I thought selling stolen property was a crime? NOT when
the RCMP do it?) All proceeds from crime also go to the Crown. Not only
do they get everything from criminal cases, if they can legislate a
crime they can seize your property as well. Call a plant that God gave
to Man a drug and you can steal everything a pot smoking hippy owns as
proceeds from “crime”. What a scam! The most insidious component of
these judicial atrocities is of course; mind control. Bust a young man
for a joint of pot and he has a criminal record that negatively impacts
everything he does. In how many ways are we “criminalized” by this
system that makes us believe we are the criminals? The “lawyers of God”
who tell you that everything you do is a crime for which you must pay
them whatever amount they can suck out of you sound like the “priests of
God” who tell you that you are born into sin and must give them
everything you can in order to save your soul from their Satanic God.
All a lawyer has to do to steal everything you own is write a rule or
regulation into a book. This is how the criminals make you look like you
are a criminal while they rob you. (This is of course slavery.) It
requires an inordinate amount of gullibility on our part, which of
course is more than motive enough to ‘dumb down’ a population.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/372c3/372c3f32338b8a2cbb32d8a6303f1059dcea4417" alt=""
Natural
Law is predicated upon a Golden Rule; “do unto others as you would have
them do unto you”. It is also based upon a few fundamental tenets;
errare humanum est, corpus humanum non recipit aestimationem, mens rea,
corpus delecti, ab abusu ad usum non valet consequential, caveat emptor,
etc… To sum up the law; Natural Law is the only legitimate and logical
form of Law. It is logical to assume that if you comport yourself in a
moral and ethical manner you will never break the law. Undermine morals
and ethics and you undermine the Natural Laws of Man that are
promulgated by reason and empathy. Equity courts govern the independent
arbitration of disputes arising out of valid written agreements. What is
“legal” refers to agreements between competent parties that have been
written down. To say something is “legal” in reference to another man
means that there is a written agreement that he is signatory to. Legal
contracts have to follow a few guidelines in order to be lawful. You
cannot contract to commit a crime. Such contracts are unlawful, void and
unenforceable. To be lawful a legal contract must have full disclosure,
mutual consideration and mutual agreement. Strictly speaking, if it is
not specifically enumerated in the agreement, it is not part of the
agreement. If you are not mutually compensated it is not lawful. If you
are forced to sign under any form of duress it is not lawful. There is
no such thing as an assumpsit, assumption or presumption in a lawfully
valid legal contract. It is easy to see that if we follow the few simple
rules above and honour our contracts that disputes will rarely arise.
One must always remember that the Legal Industry requires victims, er
customers, like any other industry. It is for this reason that they
legislate people into a position of absolute jeopardy. It makes them
easy targets.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b32cb/b32cb2967c4858a955544e1d2dfee09a4c57187b" alt=""
The definition of FREE is an interesting one; not subject to the legal constraint
of another. Can you see that the entire British legal system is quite
simply nothing more than slavery when it is applied to free men? Though
you may have a million glib and benevolent reasons you can never
legitimately make an argument for imposing legislation on a free man
because it is a crime and nothing ever justifies crimes against
humanity. Unless we have a specific agreement, nothing I do is of any
business of yours unless I do you an injury. It is for this reason that
the valid law is unwritten. Free men are self governing and not subject
to legislation. What is legislation? A legal constraint. What is a legal
constraint? It is whatever you have agreed to in writing. Now look at
the definition of a legal contract again. Have you entered into a valid
lawful contract with the government that would allow them to collect an
income tax from you? It is only the public that have entered into a
contract with the Crown and that is why the Crown only pays the Public. Let
the public pay their own damn taxes, they get all the benefits. It is
odd that the Crown tells their victims that they can find the income tax
act in the library when it is obvious that their victim should have a
complete copy of the Act that CCRA should have provided them with when
they supposedly entered into the agreement. To say that we get nothing
for our taxes is an understatement. We get far less than nothing for our
taxes. This is evidenced by the very fact that our country is in debt.
In fact, our children are born into debt. Who entered them into a legal
agreement that would compel performance? Debt peonage is slavery. Taxes
are slavery. When you control all aspects of a man’s life, that is
slavery and when you have an interest in him as a hu-man being, that is
slavery.
No comments:
Post a Comment